Majestic

  • 站点浏览器
    • Majestic
    • 摘要
    • 引用域
    • 反向链接
    • * 新建
    • * 丢失
    • 上下文
    • 锚文本
    • 网页
    • 主题
    • Link Graph
    • 相关网站
    • 高级工具
    • Author ExplorerBeta
    • Summary
    • Similar Profiles
    • Profile Backlinks
    • Attributions
  • 比较
    • 摘要
    • 反向链接历史
    • Flow Metric 历史
    • 主题
    • Clique Hunter
  • 链接工具
    • 我的 Majestic
    • 近期活动
    • 报告
    • 推广活动
    • 已验证的域
    • OpenApp
    • API 密钥
    • 关键词
    • N-grams Near Links
    • 关键词检查工具
    • 搜索浏览器
    • 链接工具
    • 批量反向链接
    • 邻居检查工具
    • 提交 URL
    • 试验
    • 索引合并
    • Link Profile 比较
    • 相同链接
    • Solo Links
    • PDF 报告
    • Typo Domain
    • TLD Checker 新建
  • Free SEO Tools
    • 立即开始
    • 反向链接检查器
    • Majestic Million
    • Majestic 插件
    • Google Sheets
    • Post Popularity
    • Social Explorer
  • 支持
    • 博客 外部链接
    • 支持
    • 立即开始
    • 工具
    • 订阅和计费
    • 常见问题
    • 术语表
    • 样式指南
    • 帮助视频
    • API 参考指南 外部链接
    • 联系我们
    • 关于反向链接和 SEO
    • SEO in 2026
    • The Majestic SEO Podcast
    • All Podcasts
    • What is Trust Flow?
    • 链接创建指南
  • 注册免费帐户
  • 计划与定价
  • 登录
  • Language flag icon
    • English
    • Deutsch
    • Español
    • Français
    • Italiano
    • 日本語
    • Nederlands
    • Polski
    • Português
    • 中文
  • 立即开始
  • 登录
  • 计划与定价
  • 注册免费帐户
    • 摘要
    • 引用域
    • 地图
    • 反向链接
    • 新建
    • 丢失
    • 上下文
    • 锚文本
    • 网页
    • 主题
    • Link Graph
    • 相关网站
    • 高级工具
    • 摘要
      专业版
    • 反向链接历史
      专业版
    • Flow Metric 历史
      专业版
    • 主题
      专业版
    • Clique Hunter
      专业版
  • 批量反向链接
    • N-grams Near Links
    • 关键词检查工具
    • 搜索浏览器
      专业版
  • 邻居检查工具
    专业版
    • 索引合并
      专业版
    • Link Profile 比较
      专业版
    • 相同链接
      专业版
    • Solo Links
      专业版
    • PDF 报告
      专业版
    • Typo Domain
      专业版
    • TLD Checker 新建
      专业版
  • 提交 URL
    • Summary
      专业版
    • Similar Profiles
      专业版
    • Profile Backlinks
      专业版
    • Attributions
      专业版
  • 定制报告
    专业版
    • 立即开始
    • 反向链接检查器
    • Majestic Million
    • Majestic 插件
    • Google Sheets
    • Post Popularity
    • Social Explorer
    • 立即开始
    • 工具
    • 订阅和计费
    • 常见问题
    • 术语表
    • 帮助视频
    • API 参考指南 外部链接
    • 联系我们
    • 消息
    • The Company
    • 样式指南
    • 条款与条件
    • 隐私政策
    • GDPR
    • 联系我们
    • SEO in 2026
    • The Majestic SEO Podcast
    • All Podcasts
    • What is Trust Flow?
    • 链接创建指南
  • 博客 外部链接
    • English
    • Deutsch
    • Español
    • Français
    • Italiano
    • 日本語
    • Nederlands
    • Polski
    • Português
    • 中文

Mark up your website with every bit of Schema that you can

Jonny Ross

Jonny feels that Schema is still very much overlooked, and that marking your site up with as much Schema as possible will greatly assist Google in understanding the context of your content.

@jonnyross  
Jonny Ross 2022 podcast cover with logo
More SEO in 2022 YouTube Podcast Playlist Link Spotify Podcast Playlist Link Audible Podcast Playlist Link Apple Podcast Playlist Link

Mark up your website with every bit of Schema that you can

Jonny says: "It's clear from Google that marking up content is what they want. If you have a website with content on it, you need to mark it up so that Google understands it. You need to give Google the content on a plate - what it's for and what it's related to - so that Google can use it in its search."

Is schema essential for every type of website?

"There's not a single website that shouldn't have some schema on it. Even if you are a local business, you could mark up your contact page with your address, phone number, Facebook account, etc. This is true all the way up to if you're an airline. There is airline schema, sports organisation schema and government organisation schema. If you look at local businesses, there is schema for animal shelters, childcare, and dentistry - to give you just a flavour. There is going to be a specific schema for you. If you are a dentist, you'd be silly not to use dentistry schema, to make it clear to Google that you're an official dentist."

Is it important to mark up other content as well, or mainly what you are as a business?

"It's far from just marking up your organisation or address. There are so many different types of schema that may be relevant to your site - from recipe schema to job schema, from schema for videos you are showing to schema for events you are running. There's not much content that you can't mark up. It's also about relating the schema. If you've got a service page, and the schema says what that service is, you can then relate it to the Meet the Team page, where you can say who delivers that service. Then, you can relate it to some of the other services that they deliver. You can also look deeper into the service and look at some of the keywords related to it. There will be other schemas that are deeper that you can relate to that as well. This way, you're painting a strong picture to Google that you're really relevant for that particular service."

How can you measure the success of implementing schema on your website?

"It's really simple. There is a misconception that the only ways that you can measure success are through ranks and traffic. Actually, inside Search Console, you can measure things like rich snippets and structured data, and how many times these have been shown in search. These are some really easy ways to track the impact, and can lead to number of impressions, number of clicks, etc. It can be easy to implement, depending on the site content."

Is there a plugin that will do this automatically for, say, a Wordpress website?

"I was recently looking at Rank Math, which is a competitor for Yoast, and there are some big benefits to it, but I don't think there's a plugin that has the capability to implement the type of schema we're talking about, yet. You're either using custom fields, or you're hard coding to relate all these things together. The issue is that there's so many different types of entities, and types of content, that a plugin would struggle to be able to offer it all."

If schema is hard coded on to a web page, is it something that may have to be removed at some point?

"Potentially. For a very small website, where you're looking at just an address on a contact page, then it's a lot quicker and easier to just hard code the schema than anything else. For a large website that has a significant number of pages and categories, then you would look for a better solution. Hard coding shows that schema can be implemented quickly and easily. In a small business, it doesn't need to be kept on top of, because you're not changing information like the address, or the Twitter account often. It's information that stays in the footer of your website or sits on your Contact Us page."

In layman's terms, how does Schema work?

"As an example of how schema works: if you Google 'chicken pasta' you will be presented with a number of different recipes. Each one has a picture, the cook time, the ingredients, etc. - and it will show you the reviews as well. Those bits of data are being shown to you because they're marked up on the website using schema. Therefore, Google categorically knows what the official cook time, or number of calories, is and can show it on the search page. Without the schema, you would need a human to actually read the page and categorise those bits of information. Review schema is a good example of something that needs to be marked up, to say to Google what your official reviews are, what your average rating is, etc."

Would the About Us page, and perhaps the footer section of the website, be the best place to get started with this?

"The quickest win is being able to say to Google: this is the official name, the address, and the phone number, and these are social media links. Those things commonly would be on the Contact Us page or in the footer of the site. You also have the ability to mark up the logo to say this is the official organization's logo. Those would be the first things to implement. Then it would depend on the category of the website. If you are a recruitment website, you absolutely need job schema; if you're a recipe website, you absolutely need recipe schema. If you're B2B or providing services, then you need to start thinking about how you can mark up the services. You need to make sure that you are connecting the dots for Google and showing the relevance of your services.

It's all about giving the search engine greater confidence in what your content is about. Schema is one of the few things that all search engines have agreed on using. Whether it's Bing, Google, or Yahoo - it doesn't matter. The format is the same for each search engine so, as long as you focus on schema, you're ticking the boxes for all search."

How does an SEO articulate the commercial value of marking up schema to management?

"If they buy into SEO in the first place, and into how traffic is brought to a website, then breaking down how schema works will make the value fairly obvious. You can also give examples. You might look at featured snippets and look at voice searches based on the top featured snippet, which is based on schema. It's easy to demonstrate schema being used in a lot of different places. You can show what a great listing looks like on a mobile device, for example, with good schema that has additional rich elements. Then compare that to a listing without good schema, that won't show information like reviews and contact details.

Typically, the data will show change within two or three weeks of implementation. The changes will speak for themselves in terms of results in Search Console."

What is the difference, in terms of click-through, for a result that has rich elements on it compared to a standard search listing?

"In the data there is a clear difference, in terms of click-through rates, when you have got rich data around a listing. I have a particular client that dominates in Google for having reviews on their listings. For any search that's related to them, they appear, and 9 times out of 10, they're the only result on the page that has a review listed. That drives a lot of traffic. I haven't got the numbers to share with you, but it's common sense that the eye is drawn to it, and it has a trust factor.

It has a similar impact to Google Authorship, where you were able to put a picture of the author next to the listing, but it's supported by multiple search engines so it's not going away.

The brilliant thing about schema is that it's content that's visible on the page, unlike meta titles and meta descriptions. You're marking up content, we're not talking about something that's hidden."

What's one thing that SEOs should stop doing, to focus more time on schema?

"Google came out this week talking about meta titles, and how they are going to have far less weighting on the headlines that will be used within search. What they are going to be far more interested in is H1s, H2s and H3s on the page. They want to provide content that's more likely to fit the page than what you're trying to tell Google the page is about. This backs up the value of schema because, firstly, Google likes markup and, secondly, it's visible content on the page. The thing to stop focusing on is invisible content like title tags and meta titles."

You can find Jonny Ross over at Fleek.marketing.

@jonnyross  

Choose Your Own Learning Style

Webinar iconVideo

If you like to get up-close with your favourite SEO experts, these one-to-one interviews might just be for you.

Watch all of our episodes, FREE, on our dedicated SEO in 2022 playlist.

youtube Playlist Icon

Podcast iconPodcast

Maybe you are more of a listener than a watcher, or prefer to learn while you commute.

SEO in 2022 is available now via all the usual podcast platforms

Spotify Apple Podcasts Audible

Book iconBook

This is our favourite. Sometimes it's better to sit and relax with a nice book.

The best of our range of interviews is available right now as a physical copy and eBook.

Amazon US Amazon UK

Don't miss out

Opt-in to receive email updates.

It's the fastest way to find out more about SEO in 2026.


欢迎您对此页面提出改进意见。请告诉我们

最新索引 More info about Fresh Index icon

抓取的唯一 URL 184,549,640,907
发现的唯一 URL 543,677,031,573
日期范围 08 Jun 2026 到 06 Oct 2026
上次更新 1小时4分钟以前

历史索引 More info about Fresh Index icon

抓取的唯一 URL 4,502,566,935,407
发现的唯一 URL 21,743,308,221,308
日期范围 06 Jun 2006 到 26 Mar 2024
上次更新 03 May 2024

社交

  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Facebook
  • Bluesky
  • Twitter

公司

  • 博客 外部链接
  • 关于
  • 条款与条件
  • 隐私政策
  • GDPR
  • 联系我们

工具

  • 计划与定价
  • 站点浏览器
  • 比较域
  • 批量反向链接
  • 搜索浏览器
  • 开发者 API 外部链接

MAJESTIC 适用于

  • Trust Flow(信任来源)
  • Flow Metric 分值
  • Link Context
  • 反向链接检查器
  • 影响者发现
  • 企业 外部链接

PODCASTS & PUBLICATIONS

  • The Majestic SEO Podcast
  • SEO in 2026
  • SEO in 2025
  • SEO in 2024
  • 2023 年的 SEO(搜索引擎优化)
  • 2022 年的 SEO(搜索引擎优化)
  • All Podcasts
top ^